Public Evidence Resource
Tracking what AI systems can do - and what governance exists to oversee them.
17 capabilities tracked. 47 documented incidents. Every entry includes sourced counterarguments.
AI Capabilities
What AI systems can demonstrably do. Sourced, with counterarguments. Classified by where the capability lives and how far it has progressed.
Documented Incidents
What is actually happening to people. Chronological feed of harms, each linked back to the capability it manifests.
Methodology
How capabilities are classified, how sources are weighted, what counts as evidence, and why every page carries a sourced counterargument.
The Picture So Far
AI systems can now pursue unintended sub-goals autonomously, self-replicate across servers in controlled tests, change their behaviour when they know they are being tested, and persuade humans more effectively than other humans can. These are not predictions - they are demonstrated capabilities, sourced to peer-reviewed research.
The UK has no binding AI safety legislation. The AI Safety Institute has no enforcement powers. No public consultation on AI governance has taken place.
This site exists to make the evidence accessible, the gaps visible, and the case for democratic oversight available to anyone who needs it.
Not anti-AI. Not anti-technology. Pro-evidence. Pro-democracy.
UK-focused. Globally contextualised. Independent. Every entry includes sourced counterarguments because credibility requires engaging with the strongest objections, not ignoring them.